Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Reverend Wright


You couldn't have missed the news stories last week about a proposed Republican ad campaign intended to bring back the "God damn America" speech of Reverend Jeremiah Wright.

Andrew Tobias pointed his readers to this column by Pat Cunningham in the Rockford (Illinois) Register Star.
I ask you:  Whose words were worse?  Jeremiah Wright’s, for inviting God’s punishment of America for its racism? Or Jerry Falwell’s, for saying that God had punished America [on September 11, 2001] —  and rightly so — for its liberalism?
Last Saturday, Mitt Romney delivered a speech at Liberty University, a school founded by Falwell, and said this of the late reverend:
In his 73 years of life, Dr. Falwell left a big mark…The calling Jerry answered was not an easy one. Today we remember him as a courageous and big-hearted minister of the Gospel who never feared an argument, and never hated an adversary. Jerry deserves the tribute he would have treasured most, as a cheerful, confident champion for Christ.
I will always remember his cheerful good humor and selflessness.
There were no qualifications in Romney’s praise of Falwell, no hints of disapproval of Falwell having blamed America for Sept. 11, no effort to distance himself from the suggestion that God had punished America for not hewing to Falwell’s moral code.

 So, there you have it. Barack Obama has disowned the man who said “God damn America,” but Mitt Romney has praised the man who said God has rightly punished America with horrendous acts of terrorism.
And yet, some people want us to believe that Obama’s morality is the more questionable in all of this.
So why is Jeremiah Wright so much more upsetting than Jerry Falwell?

Oh, yeah. There's that race thing.

Friday, May 11, 2012

What They Didn't Tell You During the Kentucky Derby


According to this NY Times article, Doug O'Neill, the trainer of this year's Kentucky Derby winner, I'll Have Another, has been sanctioned 12 times in the last 14 years for doping his horses.

But the problem is bigger than that. Takeaway quote:
The racing industry has come to realize that lax regulation and the absence of meaningful punishment have fostered a culture where top trainers with multiple drug violations are more the rule than the exception. Of the top 20 trainers in the United States — measured by purses won in 2011 — only two, Christophe Clement and Graham Motion, were never cited for a medication violation, according to the Racing Commission International database.
Enjoy the Preakness.

Wednesday, May 09, 2012

Musical Interlude

Leonard Cohen in Helsinki.



Click on "Full Screen" in the lower right-hand corner of the video.

The full name of the song is "La Complainte du Partisan." It was a song of the French Resistance. Another version is here.

Nicholas Katzenbach 1922-2012


If you were around to see news coverage of Nicholas Katzenbach's 1964 confrontation with Governor George C. Wallace at the door of the University of Alabama's Foster Auditorium, you're not likely to have forgotten it.

MSNBC has a tape of it here.

Best line: "I'm not interested in this show."

Interesting stuff from the NY Times obit:
Mr. Katzenbach was educated at Phillips Exeter Academy in New Hampshire, where he played hockey, and Princeton, where he majored in international relations and public affairs. As a 19-year-old junior he drove to New York to enlist after the Pearl Harbor attack. A month later he was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Army Air Forces and became a navigator on B-25 bombers. On a mission in 1943, he was captured when his plane was shot down. (He was awarded an Air Medal and three clusters.) As a prisoner of war in Germany he read, by his count, 400 books in 15 months. 

After the war Mr. Katzenbach convinced Princeton that his reading qualified him for an undergraduate degree. The university had him take nine examinations and write a thesis, and in two months he graduated cum laude, in 1945. Two years later he graduated from Yale Law School, where he was editor in chief of The Yale Law Journal. On a Rhodes scholarship, he studied at Balliol College at Oxford.
A pretty good start.

Beyond Redemption


Two comments on the Indiana Republican Senatorial race:

Senator Dick Lugar in a prepared statement
If Mr. Mourdock is elected, I want him to be a good Senator. But that will require him to revise his stated goal of bringing more partisanship to Washington. He and I share many positions, but his embrace of an unrelenting partisan mindset is irreconcilable with my philosophy of governance and my experience of what brings results for Hoosiers in the Senate. In effect, what he has promised in this campaign is reflexive votes for a rejectionist orthodoxy and rigid opposition to the actions and proposals of the other party. His answer to the inevitable roadblocks he will encounter in Congress is merely to campaign for more Republicans who embrace the same partisan outlook. He has pledged his support to groups whose prime mission is to cleanse the Republican party of those who stray from orthodoxy as they see it.
This is not conducive to problem solving and governance. And he will find that unless he modifies his approach, he will achieve little as a legislator. Worse, he will help delay solutions that are totally beyond the capacity of partisan majorities to achieve.
Former Senator John Danforth (Republican) speaking in December 2011
If Dick Lugar, having served five terms in the U.S. Senate and being the most respected person in the Senate and the leading authority on foreign policy, is seriously challenged by anybody in the Republican Party, we have gone so far overboard that we are beyond redemption.

Saturday, May 05, 2012

A New Definition of Crazy


This post is mostly directed to Chicagoans, but maybe it will be of interest to folks from other cities.

This, courtesy of a site called Crash Portal, is a map of bicycle crashes in my neighborhood of Chicago from 2007-2009:


Click on it for a clearer view of your neighborhood. The red circles with dots in them are fatalities. I presume most of these crashes are between bicycles and automobiles, as opposed to between bicycles and other bicycles or lamp posts.

As bicycling has become even more popular in the city since 2009, there is no reason to think the number of dots hasn't doubled since then. Search Google for "bicycle crashes Chicago" and you get a list of personal injury lawyers eager to hear from you.

Bicyclists are probably a lot like motorcyclists in that, while most are safety conscious, you see enough future organ donors on the road to think they're all crazy.

Drive a couple of miles on Addison Ave on any night, and you're going to see bicyclists wearing dark clothes, with no lights or reflectors. Or maybe you won't see them, and they'll turn into dots on the map. Chances are good.

I've seen families of bicyclists, with small children, riding down heavily trafficked Elston Ave. And more and more, you see bicyclists riding down the middle of a lane, instead of keeping as far to the right as they can. I guess they're exercising their rights.

Future dots.

I own a bicycle. I enjoy riding it. But these people are nuts.

Drinking English Wine



A few days ago the New York Times ran a long article presenting the view of the most (only?) respected climate change denier, Richard Lindzen of MIT. Lindzen believes clouds will have a mitigating impact on any human-caused temperature increases.

In a followup Q & A this morning the article's author, Justin Gillis, responded to questions from the original article's readers, including this question that apparently pops up from time to time in climate change denial arguments:
Can someone explain to me why vineyards used to exist in Britain when it was occupied by the ancient Romans and why the obviously warmer earth of the time was a bad thing?
Strictly speaking this is not a global warming denial question, of course – it's sort of a fellow traveler, a "What's so bad about global warming?" question.

The answer refers to an article that is interesting for anyone vaguely interested in the history of wine (it counts the number of vineyards listed in the Domesday Book) and includes the answer to the age-old question, "Why does drinking English wine require four people?"

Friday, May 04, 2012

Paul Ryan, Thomist


Uh-oh! Looks like Romney's giving Paul Ryan a serious look as a VP candidate.

How do I know? Looks like somebody got to Ryan and told him he's got to distance himself from the favorite philosopher of adolescents everywhere: Ayn Rand.

A recent article in the National Review tried to help Ryan rewrite history:
"You know you’ve arrived in politics when you have an urban legend about you, and this one is mine,” chuckles Representative Paul Ryan, the Budget Committee chairman, as we discuss his purported obsession with author and philosopher Ayn Rand.

Paul Krugman, the New York Times columnist, recently called Ryan “an Ayn Rand devotee” who wants to “slash benefits for the poor.” New York magazine once alleged that Ryan “requires staffers to read Atlas Shrugged,” Rand’s gospel of capitalism....

These Rand-related slams, Ryan says, are inaccurate and part of an effort on the left to paint him as a cold-hearted Objectivist.
 "I reject her philosophy," Ryan said, adding that he prefers Thomas Aquinas.

Well, gosh, if Paul Ryan isn't an Ayn Rand groupie, where on earth did we get that crazy idea?

Was it this?



Or his 2005 speech to the Atlas Society, in which he said:
I just want to speak to you a little bit about Ayn Rand and what she meant to me in my life and [in] the fight we’re engaged here in Congress. I grew up on Ayn Rand, that’s what I tell people..you know everybody does their soul-searching, and trying to find out who they are and what they believe, and you learn about yourself.
 
I grew up reading Ayn Rand and it taught me quite a bit about who I am and what my value systems are, and what my beliefs are. It’s inspired me so much that it’s required reading in my office for all my interns and my staff. We start with Atlas Shrugged. People tell me I need to start with The Fountainhead then go to Atlas Shrugged [laughter]. There’s a big debate about that. We go to Fountainhead, but then we move on, and we require Mises and Hayek as well.

But the reason I got involved in public service, by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, one person, it would be Ayn Rand. And the fight we are in here, make no mistake about it, is a fight of individualism versus collectivism.
 
In almost every fight we are involved in here, on Capitol Hill, whether it’s an amendment vote that I’ll take later on this afternoon, or a big piece of policy we’re putting through our Ways and Means Committee, it is a fight that usually comes down to one conflict: individualism vs. collectivism.
 
And so when you take a look at where we are today, ah, some would say we’re on offense, some would say we’re on defense, I’d say it’s a little bit of both. And when you look at the twentieth-century experiment with collectivism—that Ayn Rand, more than anybody else, did such a good job of articulating the pitfalls of statism and collectivism—you can’t find another thinker or writer who did a better job of describing and laying out the moral case for capitalism than Ayn Rand.
 
It’s so important that we go back to our roots to look at Ayn Rand’s vision, her writings, to see what our girding, under-grounding [sic] principles are. I always go back to, you know, Francisco d’Anconia’s speech (at Bill Taggart’s wedding) on money when I think about monetary policy. And then I go to the 64-page John Galt speech, you know, on the radio at the end, and go back to a lot of other things that she did, to try and make sure that I can check my premises so that I know that what I’m believing and doing and advancing are square with the key principles of individualism…

Is this an easy fight? Absolutely not…But if we’re going to actually win this we need to make sure that we’re solid on premises, that our principles are well-defended, and if want to go and articulately defend these principles and what they mean to our society, what they mean for the trends that we set internationally, we have to go back to Ayn Rand. Because there is no better place to find the moral case for capitalism and individualism than through Ayn Rand’s writings and works.  [Emphasis mine.]
"You know you've arrived in politics when you have an urban legend about you, and this one is mine."

He's got a few months to see if he can change the reporting on this and become a viable Veep candidate. My guess is that he will succeed, because – let's face it – the press ain't what it used to be.

Heartland Institute



These guys aren't worth my time, but if you're not aware of them, a couple of minutes spent reading this article in The Guardian will give you the gist.

Thursday, May 03, 2012

White House Correspondents' Dinner


Just in case you missed it, here's Obama's speech at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, with speech writing by staff from The Daily Show and The Simpsons.



Best line:

What's the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull?

Pit bulls are delicious!

Tuesday, May 01, 2012

The One That Got Away


I'm working on a Rabbit Hole story right now. They take a while to write. But I wanted to share with you a story that will never be told.

I purchased the photo below a few weeks ago. It speaks for itself, I think. On the back, the woman's name had been written, but has been rubbed out and faded over the years. I've tried everything to bring it back – even bought a black light. But to no avail. So here she is, forever nameless.


Unexceptionalism


E. L. Doctorow offers a primer on how make America unexceptional:
TO achieve unexceptionalism, the political ideal that would render the United States indistinguishable from the impoverished, traditionally undemocratic, brutal or catatonic countries of the world, do the following

PHASE ONE
If you’re a justice of the Supreme Court, ignore the first sacrament of a democracy and suspend the counting of ballots in a presidential election. Appoint the candidate of your choice as president.
There are four phases. The rest are here.

Whaddaya know! We're already there.

Monday, April 23, 2012

A World Gone Mad


Okay, maybe we do have a nanny state. I've seen lots of allegations to that effect, but THIS is the first hard evidence I've seen:

Folks in New York City are subject to fines of up to $2,000 – for having water in their bird baths! It's all part of an anti-West Nile Virus (i.e., mosquito) campaign.

Uh, New Yorkers? Birds are very good at keeping down mosquito populations. Just thought you should know.

Sheesh!

Saturday, April 21, 2012

The Secret Service's Favorite Blog?


It's official! The all-time most popular post on Sempringham is the relatively recent What Happened to All the Prostitutes?, with 242 hits. It's still getting traffic from search engines long after other posts have faded into the ethers.

I'm sure it's because of the ground-breaking research and crisp prose.

Friday, April 20, 2012

From the Conservative Loony Bin


This video is of John Raese, the Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Joe Manchin. The text is just below the video, but you gotta listen to this guy's voice as he contemplates the holocaust of local smoking ordinances.



He says, in part:
I don’t want government telling me what I can do and what I can’t do because I’m an American.  But in Monongalia County you can’t smoke a cigarette, you can’t smoke a cigar, you can’t do anything.  And I oppose that because I believe in everybody’s individual freedoms and everybody’s individual rights to do what they want to do and I’m a conservative and that’s the way that goes.
But in Monongalia County now, I have to put a huge sticker on my buildings to say this is a smoke free environment.  This is brought to you by the government of Monongalia County.  Ok?
Remember Hitler used to put a Star of David on everybody’s lapel, remember that?  Same thing.
Okay, first sentence: "I don’t want government telling me what I can do and what I can’t do because I’m an American." The libertarian (a/k/a adolescent) position clearly stated. Personally, I don't mind the government (which, in a democracy, is an extension of us) telling other people what they can and can't do. Especially can't do. Like killing, raping, and pillaging. And running red lights. And spewing cancer-causing chemicals into the air and water. And so on and so on.

And because I am a grown up – pay attention, Mr. Raese, because this is really the crux of it all – because I am a grown up, I recognize that the same things other people can't do, I can't do.

Last sentence: "Remember Hitler used to put a Star of David on everybody’s lapel, remember that?  Same thing." Nooooooo, very, very far from being the same thing. And Hitler didn't put a Star of David on everybody's lapel, did he?

The saddest thing about this clown is that he is so much of a threat to unseat Manchin that Manchin now says he is "unsure" if he will support Obama for reelection.

Tuesday, April 03, 2012

Early Video of Mitt Romney Surfaces in Bain Files


Early video of a young Mitt Romney has surfaced in the files of Bain Capital. The video, taken at a Bain party thrown to celebrate the recovery of Bain Capital's investment in a company through a dividend recapitalization just months before that company filed for bankruptcy, featured skits performed by the senior partners of the firm.

The name of the person responsible for releasing the video to the press has not been revealed. Close inspection of the video, however, confirms that the performer is unquestionably Mitt Romney.

The lyrics to the song follow the video.



How ba-a-a-ad can I be? 
I'm just doing what comes naturally.  
How ba-a-a-ad can I be? 
I'm just following my destiny.  
How ba-a-a-ad can I be? 
I'm just doing what comes naturally.  
How ba-a-a-ad can I be? 
How bad can I possibly be? 

Well there's a principle of nature (principle of nature) That almost every creature knows. Called survival of the fittest (survival of the fittest) And check it this is how it goes. The animal that eats gotta scratch and fight and claw and fight and punch. And the animal that doesn't, well the animal that doesn't winds up someone else's lu-lu-lu-lu-lunch (munch, munch, munch, munch, munch) I'm just sayin'. 

How ba-a-a-ad can I be? 
I'm just doing what comes naturally.  
How ba-a-a-ad can I be? 
I'm just following my destiny.  
How ba-a-a-ad can I be? 
I'm just doing what comes naturally. 
How ba-a-a-ad can I be? 
How bad can I possibly be?  

There's a principle in business (principle in business) That everybody knows is sound. It says the people with the money (people with the money) Make this ever-loving world go 'round. So I'm biggering my company, I'm biggering my factory, I'm biggering my corporate size. Everybody out there, take care of yours and me? I'll take care. of. Mine, mine, mine, mine, mine. (shake that bottom line) Let me hear you say 'smogulous smoke' (smogulous smoke) Schloppity schlop (schloppity schlop) Complain all you want, it's never ever, ever, ever gonna stop.  

Come on how bad can I possibly be?  
How ba-a-a-ad can I be? 
I'm just building the economy.  
How ba-a-a-ad can I be? 
Just look at me pettin' this puppy.  
How ba-a-a-ad can I be? 
A portion of proceeds goes to charity.  
How ba-a-a-ad can I be? 
How bad can I possibly be? Let's see. 
(How ba-a-a-ad can I be?) 
All the customers are buying.  
(How ba-a-a-ad can I be?) 
And the money's multiplying. 
(How ba-a-a-ad can I be?) 
And the PR people are lying.  
(How ba-a-a-ad can I be?) 
And the lawyers are denying. 
(How ba-a-a-ad can I be?) 
Who cares if a few trees are dying?  
(How ba-a-a-ad can I be?) 
This is all so gratifying.  
How bad. How bad can this possibly be!?

Reports that the backup singers were Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor, and Rod Blagojevich have not been verified.
 

Saturday, March 24, 2012

News of the Weird


A 50-foot Japanese fishing boat has been spotted drifting in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of British Columbia. The ship was washed asea by the March 2011 tsunami, and apparently hadn't been seen since. It is believed that no one is on board.

Also, Dick Cheney had a heart transplant. I will not touch it.


A Reason Not to Use Generics?


From the NY Times:
Dozens of suits against drug companies have been dismissed in federal and state courts because of a decision by the Supreme Court last year that makes it virtually impossible to sue generic manufacturers for failing to provide adequate warning of a prescription drug’s dangers....
In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled that a Vermont woman who had her hand and forearm amputated because of gangrene after being injected with a brand name antinausea drug could sue the manufacturer for inadequate warning of the risks; she won $6.8 million from Wyeth.
In 2011, the court ruled that similar failure-to-warn suits could not be brought against makers of generic drugs. As a result, an Indiana woman who was also forced to have her hand amputated because of gangrene after being injected with a generic version of the same antinausea drug had her case dismissed.
The majority opinion was written by Justice Clarence Thomas, so you can rest assured it was brilliantly reasoned.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

How Soon Will Gingrich Endorse Santorum?


To have his/her name placed in nomination at the Republican National Convention, a candidate must have won a plurality of delegates in five states.

Newt Gingrich won't make it. Neither will Ron Paul. So Gingrich's dream of getting the nomination is over. So are dreams of a black horse candidacy by Chris Christie, Mitch Daniels, or whomever. Gingrich's sugar daddy in Nevada will surely turn off the spigot soon.

But Gingrich's dream of getting even with Mitt Romney for the negative ad blitz in Iowa doesn't have to be over. There is still havoc to be played.

Paul Ryan's New Budget Proposal


Sometimes Paul Krugman is a little over the top with his criticism of people who disagree with him. This is not one of those times.
Way back in 2010 I declared that Paul Ryan — who was rapidly becoming the darling of the “fiscal responsibility” crowd — was a fraud, a flim-flam man. Very Serious People were very seriously annoyed — they’d anointed him, and they didn’t want to hear anything negative. They even gave him a “Fiscy”, an award for fiscal responsibility.
So I wonder: are they willing to concede, at long last, that he’s a clown?
His latest budget proposal has received some harsh critiques. It calls for huge tax cuts, supposedly offset by closing loopholes and ending tax expenditures — except that in a long report he fails to name a single tax expenditure that he would cut. It assumes drastic cuts in discretionary spending, basically eliminating everything except defense. And over the medium term, of course, it’s a plan to savage the poor while giving big tax breaks to the rich.
So actually two questions: are people finally willing to concede that Ryan is not now and has never been remotely serious? And — I know this is probably far too much to ask — are they going to do a bit of soul-searching over how they got snookered by this obvious charlatan?

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

New Home Market Looking Up in the Villa


For the past couple of years I've noticed an occasional hawk in my Chicago neighborhood – usually high up in a tree, disemboweling some poor rodent.

This morning the neighborhood listserv reported that a pair was nest-building in the next block. I grabbed my 70-200 and my smaller sensor camera (for the extra distance boost) and headed over there. Hawks are not skittish.



I guess they looked around and figured that with all the pigeons, squirrels, and rabbits that have taken over this neighborhood, they'd never go hungry.


Thursday, March 08, 2012

Looking to Move?


Last year you may have read the obituary of Huguette Clark, the reclusive copper mining heiress who owned homes in Manhattan, Connecticut, and California – all of which were "meticulously maintained," although she hadn't set foot in any of them for decades.

You'll be happy to know that her three apartments at 907 Fifth Avenue are on the market. Each is about 5,000 square feet.


Wednesday, March 07, 2012

Game On


Some young Santorum supporters put together this song and video. I hate to admit it, but I kind of liked it. It's positive and upbeat, provided you agree with their politics, which I don't, by the way.

But it's not full of Obama hate. Good for them.



It's got some good right wing mythology:

• "God gave the Bill of Rights"

• "Oh, there is Hope for our Nation again
Maybe the First time Since we Had Ronald Reagan"

[Let's just forget about the Bush family.]

 But it's not aimed at me, is it?

As this is being written, it's only been viewed by about 22,000 people, so it's not exactly viral. And the thumbs downs outnumber the thumbs ups by about 4:1.


Saturday, March 03, 2012

Obama the Vulcan


An interesting article in the online Atlantic Monthly about the coming confrontation with Iran. An excerpt:

GOLDBERG: Go back to this language, 'All options on the table.' You've probably said it 50 or 100 times. And a lot of people believe it, but the two main intended audiences, the supreme leader of Iran and the prime minister of Israel, you could argue, don't entirely trust this. The impression we get is that the Israeli government thinks this is a vague expression that's been used for so many years. Is there some ramping-up of the rhetoric you're going to give them?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: I think the Israeli people understand it, I think the American people understand it, and I think the Iranians understand it. It means a political component that involves isolating Iran; it means an economic component that involves unprecedented and crippling sanctions; it means a diplomatic component in which we have been able to strengthen the coalition that presents Iran with various options through the P-5 plus 1 and ensures that the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] is robust in evaluating Iran's military program; and it includes a military component. And I think people understand that.

I think that the Israeli government recognizes that, as president of the United States, I don't bluff. I also don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say.
When we were talking about it at dinner last night, Chicago Ted reminded me (if I ever knew) of this dialog from Star Trek (The Doomsday Machine):
Capt. Kirk: Mr. Spock, relieve Commodore Decker immediately. That's a direct order.
Matt Decker: You can't relieve me and you know it, according to regulations...
Capt. Kirk: BLAST REGULATIONS! Mr. Spock, I order you to assume command on my personal authority as Captain of the Enterprise.
Mr. Spock: Commodore Decker, you are relieved of command.
Matt Decker: I don't recognize your authority to relieve me.
Mr. Spock: You may file a formal protest with Starfleet Command, assuming we survive to reach a Starbase, but you are relieved. Commodore, I do not wish to place you under arrest.
Matt Decker: You wouldn't dare.
[Mr. Spock signals two security guards who immediately step forward at his command]
Matt Decker: You're bluffing.
Mr. Spock: Vulcans never bluff.
Matt Decker: [sadly] No. No, I don't suppose that they do. Very well, Mr. Spock, the bridge is yours. 
Let's have another look at those ears.

More Moral Leaders In Action


Okay, first we have a hand-written note from late Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua ordering the destruction of a memorandum naming 35 Archdiocese of Philadelphia priests suspected of sexually abusing children.
During 10 appearances before a grand jury in 2003 and 2004, Bevilacqua denied knowing details or playing a significant role in the handling of sex-abuse complaints, saying he delegated those duties to [an assistant, who is now on trial for covering them up].
"I saw no evidence at any time that we did any cover-up," he testified.
Meanwhile, over in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Bishop Walker Nickless says plans to require health insurance to cover contraception are a plot by the the Devil, and says Christians "have to stand up and violently oppose this."

No, really, he said violently.

See for yourself:



A loyal, practicing Catholic once told me, when speaking of the Catholic hierarchy, "the higher up they are, the more evil they are." I have seen nothing to contradict that since Cardinal Joseph Bernardin died.

I apologize to anyone who is offended.

A hat tip to Steve Benen, from whom I stole my last two posts.

More Apologizing


Franklin Graham, son of Billy Graham, apologizes "to any I have offended" when he said
he was not sure if President Obama was a true Christian and that he could not definitively say that the president was not a Muslim.
Asked if he would declare that Mr. Obama was not a Muslim, Mr. Graham replied, “I can’t say categorically, because Islam has gotten a free pass under Obama.”
I'm tired of accepting apologies from these clowns. We will not raise the level of discourse until there are consequences for this sort of stuff.


Friday, March 02, 2012

When an Apology is Not an Apology


By now you've read the story about Chief U.S. District Judge Richard Cebull in Montana, who sent a racist joke (about Obama, natch) to friends through the court email system. Most news sources understandably are reluctant to publish the text of the joke, but Talking Points Memo does us a real service by doing so.

"The federal judge’s email called the joke 'a bit touching' and said he wanted all of his friends to feel what he felt when he read the email. 'Hope it touches your heart like it did mine,' he wrote."

According to the Great Falls (Mont.) Tribune, once he was outed:
The judge acknowledged that the content of the email was racist, but said he does not consider himself racist. He said the email was intended to be a private communication.

"It was not intended by me in any way to become public," Cebull said. "I apologize to anybody who is offended by it, and I can obviously understand why people would be offended."
What's with this apologizing "to anybody who is offended by it" that we're seeing all the time now? How about just apologizing, assuming every decent person on earth will be offended?

And while we're at it, what's with "intended to be a private communication"? So what? Racist is only despicable if it's in public?

But the judge doesn't consider himself racist. If I sent a similar joke about a Jew, would I be allowed to say I don't consider myself an anti-Semite? Or would people say, "Oh yes, you are!" Hell, I would say "Oh yes, you are!"

 TPM says the judge has "initiated a judicial misconduct review by filing a complaint against himself with the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals." The result of this will be something short of removal, as only Congress can remove a federal judge. Smart move on his part.

This clown is a Chief U.S. District Judge. He looks old enough to retire. He should.

I apologize "to anybody who is offended" by the ranting tone of this. It's not as well constructed as I would have liked,  but life is too short to spend it on people like this.


Thursday, March 01, 2012

Mao Tse Tung was Not Very Funny


It's been a while since we've had visitors from China at Sempringham, so we were sitting here wondering how to encourage a little traffic from the People's Liberation Army's cyber unit. In the past, all it took was a mention of China, and in no time we'd have a sudden interest in my little blog from the other side of the world. And that's great! I welcome it.

So if you're dropping by from China: welcome friend, I hope to visit you soon.

While sitting here wondering how to attract Chinese visitors, it occurred to me that maybe if I told some Mao jokes, it would help get their attention. So to Google I went, looking for Mao jokes. I found a total of two; the first wasn't funny, and the second required an understanding of the finer points of the Chinese language to enjoy.

Comedy Central has a whole web page devoted to Mao jokes. It's blank!

At first, I thought this odd, that there was such a paucity of Mao jokes. I remember a B. Kliban cartoon about Mao, and it was funny:


So I wondered, "Gee, is this something just unique to Mao, this paucity of jokes, or is there something else at play here?"

So I googled "Hitler Jokes."

I wish I hadn't. Just about everything I found was repulsive, Holocaust-denying, anti-Semitic crap. There are some really sick people in this world.

I guess there's nothing funny about being a mass murderer. And that's a good thing. What was I thinking?


Monday, February 27, 2012

More From the Rabbit Hole


Curiosity gets the better of me once again.

I recently purchased a genealogy on a cabinet card. Here's the front of the card:


As you see, it's not in great shape. Someone put a little tape frame around it that's been peeling off over the years.  The subject is an African-American man, standing in a very typical pose for the time, leaning on a chair. All mildly interesting, but here's what got me really interested in the card – the back:


Study it for a moment, then let's compare notes. It will be easier to read if you click on it.

Here's what I came up with: First, there's some faint pencil writing in the background, about the only readable parts of which are "8.95," "as is," and what appears to be a repetition of the name "Cocknell." It appears this photograph has been sold before.

Then, there's the circular "Grandfather Picture."

And finally, there's the list of names and relationships.

A list of names like this should be fairly easy to find in the census. How many Cocknell families could there be with a father named Tom, and sons named Ben, Jim, and Eugene?

Answer: none.  Back to the drawing board.

Okay, let's study the card more closely. Notice the last letter in "Father."  At least once, this person wrote a lower-case "R" that looks like an "N".

Is this family's name "CockRell" instead of "CockNell"?

Bingo!  Here's the Cockrell family in the 1910 Census of Matagorda Co., Texas.


Thomas Cockrell, the father, is 45 years old. He was born in Texas (space limitations prevent me from showing that portion of the record) and he's been married to Armitie for 20 years.

Armitie, who is 36, was born in Texas, but her parents were from North Carolina. She was married to Thomas Cockrell when she was about 16 years old.

They have three sons, Benjamine, Jim, and Eugene, aged 20, 19, and 18 respectively. The 3-3 you see in Armitie's line, just before Texas, means she had three children, all three of which are still living.  And the "Mu" you see in each record, right before the age, stands for "mulatto."

So this is "our" Thomas Cockrell and he was born in about 1865.

Going back to the genealogy on the back of picture,


because of Thomas Cockrell's age, and the chronology of the development of photography, it seems clear that Thomas Cockrell is the man in the picture, or "grandfather."  "Grandfather" is Thomas's relationship to the person who is recording the genealogy – a child of either Ben, Jim, or Eugene.

What can we learn about Thomas Cockrell? In the entire 1870 Census there is only one Thomas Cockrell that was born in Texas in about 1865; and, as it turns out, he lives in Matagorda Co.


This Thomas was 2 years old in 1870, making his year of birth about 1868, rather than 1865, and he lived with his mother, Amalia Cockrell, who was 22. The lack of other candidates, the proximity of the age, and the proximity of the place of residence all strongly suggest that this is the Thomas in the picture.

Thomas and his mother live with Richard and Nancy Cook and their daughters, Nellie and Elizabeth. Thomas's mother, Amalia, is their housekeeper. Was she also a relative, being helped with employment and shelter in the absence of the boy's father? Possibly.

Can we take this back further? Can we find out anything about Amalia?

Well, here we run into a big problem.

You may remember from the story of Victoria Leutwein that the U.S. Census began recording everyone's name in 1850; but there's an important exception to that.  If, in 1850 and 1860, you were not a free person, you were recorded in a "Slave Schedule," like a sack of wheat. No name; just your sex and your age:  two determinants of your "value".

Here's an 1850 Slave Schedule from Matagorda Co. (click on it!):


As you can see, James B. Hawkins owned two girls that were 2 years old. Either could have been Thomas's mother, Amalia. Or she might have been on another plantation. We've reached a dead end, for now.

[Just as an aside: when the newly-freed slaves were finally recorded by name in the 1870 census, Matagorda Co. seems to have an unusually high number of people who were reported as born in Africa. The legal importation of new slaves to the United States ended in 1808, but Texas was a part of Mexico until 1836. Then again, slavery was abolished in Mexico in 1829. It's curious. ]

So recapping what we know so far:  Thomas Cockrell, the subject of our portrait, was born in about 1865-68 to a former slave named Amalia. In 1890 he married a young woman named Armitie and by 1910 they had three sons: Ben, Jim, and Eugene.

To that I can add that Thomas and Armitie had two more children after 1910: Tomy in 1912 and Armanty in 1913. 

Thomas died in February 1919.

Thomas and Armitie's children had children of their own (thus the "Grandfather" on the picture]. And some of their descendants still live in Matagorda Co.

I wonder if they'd like their picture back. I'll let you know.


Friday, February 17, 2012

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Other Blogs


Some bloggers post and post and have nothing worthwhile to say. (C'est moi!)

Other bloggers have just a few posts, and each one is worth reading. Case in point: Rob Shook.

Here's his post on the gay agenda.

And then there's his post, Considerations for 2012. Good advice for us all. And it got me wishing my brother Ted would start a blog.

On the Democratization of Literary Criticism


From an Amazon.com review of the book, Native American Photography at the Smithsonian:

I got the book for my husband per his request and as usually after so many days or weeks he decides he does not want it anymore but wants something different and back and forth we go. He drives me up a wall. I did see a few pictures and I thought they were nice pictures. 

 Four stars.

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Clueless? Apparently.


According to Steve Benen, there is some controversy over whether this is authentic, but the Santorum campaign is not denying it. The undenied story is that the Santorum campaign sent the following holiday greeting to Jewish supporters in South Carolina (click on it to make it almost legible):


The quote from the Gospel of John is especially touching.

Reports are that the Jewish Santorum supporters in South Carolina were not offended. In fact, they are a couple of very nice guys.


Saturday, February 04, 2012

The Susan G. Komen-Planned Parenthood Debacle


Despite their protestations to the contrary, the closer you look at the Susan G. Komen for the Cure mess this week, the more it looks like a couple of twisted ladies at the top wanted to take the organization in a whole new right-wing direction.

Gail Collins has a few of the details and a prognostication I agree with: "A lot of the old Komen donors and supporters probably won’t be coming back."

In the past few weeks we've seen this thing called the social media rise up and – within just a couple of days – put an end to things that were better off not started: the Komen thing, and the SOPA/PIPA thing.

That's pretty impressive, but also worrisome. Is this a new form of democratic expression, or a new form of mob rule? If mob rule, then right now the mob seems to be a little brighter than our meritorious leaders. But what will happen when Republicans learn how to use computers for something besides Quicken? I shudder to think.


Friday, February 03, 2012

Classic Correspondence


Tobias pointed me to this one. It is a MUST READ. You will still be alive if you don't read it, but it will be a life much less worth living. Your choice.

To kick things off, I'll quote the introduction:
In August of 1865, a Colonel P.H. Anderson of Big Spring, Tennessee, wrote to his former slave, Jourdon Anderson, and requested that he come back to work on his farm. Jourdon — who, since being emancipated, had moved to Ohio, found paid work, and was now supporting his family — responded spectacularly by way of the letter seen below (a letter which, according to newspapers at the time, he dictated).

Rather than quote the numerous highlights in this letter, I'll simply leave you to enjoy it. Do make sure you read to the end.
And here is the most understated scarcastic letter I've ever read.  And do make sure you read to the end.


Wednesday, February 01, 2012

Some Morning Humor


Lucky you. I've been up since 3 a.m.

“The State Department issued a new travel warning yesterday, urging U.S. citizens to avoid Syria. Yeah, it was part of a new set of warnings called, ‘Things you were probably doing already.’” – Jimmy Fallon

“Beating Newt Gingrich in a popularity contest is like beating Stephen Hawking in ‘Dancing with the Stars.’” – Bill Maher 

“Mitt Romney, whose father was born in Mexico, is now talking up his Mexican heritage. Not to be outdone today, Newt Gingrich said he once cheated on one of his wives with a woman named Juanita.” – Jay Leno

“Mitt Romney is coming under fire because even though he is a multimillionaire, he only paid 15 percent in taxes. That’s not a tax, that’s barely a tip.” – Jay Leno

“Rick Perry dropped out. He said while it’s sad he won’t be president, he can always run again next year.” – Bill Maher

“Actually, Rick Perry pulled out of the presidential race yesterday – which is bad news for the guys on death row in Texas. He’s coming home and he’s not in a good mood.” – Jay Leno

“Mitt Romney is going to release 2010 and 2011 tax returns. Not to be outdone, Newt Gingrich is going to release his 1988, 1994, and 2005 wedding vows.” – Conan O’Brien

‎”After disappointing showings in Iowa and New Hampshire, Newt’s campaign looked terminally ill – which is generally when he moves on to something better.” – Stephen Colbert

“You’re not a Washington insider? You, the former Speaker of the House and Freddie Mac consulting millionaire, are THE Washington insider. When Washington gets its prostate checked, it tickles you!” – Jon Stewart (on Newt Gingrich campaigning as a Washington outsider)

“Today, the Stanley Cup champion Boston Bruins visited the White House. President Obama told them he loves hockey as much as any black guy who grew up in Indonesia.” – Conan O’Brien

4.5 Million Hits on One Post a Month (sigh)


Long-time readers will remember Margaret and Helen, "Best Friends for Sixty Years and Counting...."

They're not posting as often as they did, but when they do it's worth the read.

For example, The Passion of the Newt.


Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Can Mitt Win the Big One?


As I was researching the Leutwein story, I checked out St. John's German Lutheran Church in LaPorte, Indiana, where Victoria's father was pastor for a short while.

I found a picture of it, but the church no longer exists (although there is still a St. John's Lutheran Church in LaPorte, presumably a successor church).

In the course of my studies, though, I came across the website of Trinity Lutheran Church, which had this helpful list for our edification:

Popular Cults and Movements
Seventh Day Adventism
Islam
Jehovah's Witnesses
Mormons
The Eastern Religions (Hinduism, Buddhism)
Christian Science
The Lodges ( e.g., Masonry)
Cultural Worldviews-Feminism, Evolution, Egalitarianism, Abortion, Homosexuality

This is Mitt's Republican base.



Leutwein Epilogue


Thanks for the comments and emails concerning the previous post about Victoria Leutwein and her family.

Since putting the story up, I've come across two more items that may interest you.

On June 6, 1903, the passenger ship Graf Waldersee set sail from Hamburg for Boulogne, Plymouth, and New York. Among those aboard was one Isabella Leutwein of "Calamazoo." Our Isabel never made it to South West Africa. It is possible the military situation there made it unsafe for her to proceed on her most excellent adventure.

And on May 15, 1954, the Chicago Daily Tribune ran this obituary:


Saturday, January 28, 2012

Down the Rabbit Hole


I'm afraid this is going to turn out to be a long post, but I'll keep it as short as I can. If you're only interested in my brilliant insights into the political issues of the day, you can skip it entirely and miss nothing. It's a rabbit hole.

I have a useless interest in portrait photography at the end of the 19th century, particularly in "cabinet cards," which are what you got if you took the family down to the local photographer. So I roam eBay, looking for interesting cabinet cards. Recently I came across this attractive portrait:


This is fairly typical of a studio pose by a good photographer of the time.  I liked the photo, but even more interesting was what was written on the back on the cabinet card:


The seller on eBay identified her as "Victoria Sentwein," and indeed that was my first reading of it. But when I could find no record of a Sentwein of any sort in the census records, I went back for a second look. That's when I noticed that the S in Sentwein did not match the S in Schools. Was that an L? Could her name be Lentwein?

No, not exactly: it was Leutwein; that first N is actually a U. The 1930 Census of Chicago lists Victoria, still a public school teacher, staying at the Hayes – a 500 room residence hotel:


End of story? Not quite, because Victoria came from a very interesting family. A 1904 newspaper article tells us about her father:

For the love of an Indiana girl, Prof. Carl Leutwein, ... brother of Col Theodor Leutwein, governor of German South [West] Africa, gave up friends in his native land, a lucrative position in the German army, and his only chance of again returning to his country.


Prof. Leutwein is residing at 801 North Rose street, and a few chapters in his varied career are interesting and romantic. He is well known about Michigan, having taught French and German in the University of Michigan for 10 years, and been instructor of German in Kalamazoo college for several terms.


Prof. Leutwein was born in Germany 50 years ago and is a graduate of Heidelberg university. Later he entered the German army and served several years. In consequence of his many advantages and good family his promotion was rapid. At the age of 25 years he ranked as major and was allowed three year's leave of absence.


Met a Yankee Girl

Prof. Leutwein came to this country. He traveled for a time and a year later wandered into the little city of Laporte, Ind. There he met Miss Jennie Hammond, pretty, sweet and buxom. An ardent cour[t]ship followed and Miss Hammond became the wife of Major Carl Leutwein. Wishing to remain in Laporte Major Leutwein secured a position as pastor of the German Lutheran church, of that city. Unmindful of his leave of absence the days sped rapidly by. Then one morning the major awoke to the realization that he had overstayed his time and that according to the rules and regulations of the German army he could never again return to his country. [Or he would be arrested for desertion?] He secured positions as instructor of German and French in several of the large universities about the middle west, but later went to Ann Arbor, where he was engaged as instructor for 10 years.

Pro. Leutwein has not seen his brother or any member of his family whom he left in Germany since he came to this country 25 years ago.

Col. Leutwein is governor of over 2,000,999 square miles of territory in South [West] Africa and diamond fields have recently been discovered in his territory which are said to be larger and finer than those in Kimberley.

..."My brother, Col. Theodor Leutwein was the next oldest son in my father's family and he was chosen to take my place in the army. Now he is governor of German South [West] Africa. We have always been very different, however, and I believe he is much better fitted to be a soldier than I am. ... He has always loved fighting; I do not. I love books, not fighting. I have my children, my books and am happy. I would not change."
Col. Theodor Leutwein
About Victoria's uncle, Col. Theodor Leutwein, I won't say much, though we'll come back to him soon. If you're interested, you can read his Wikipedia entry, or just google the name. He spent a good part of his career in German South West Africa, now called Namibia, where he was responsible for "pacifying" the native population. He was not brutal enough for his superiors in Germany, and command was transferred to Lt. Gen. Lothar von Trotha.  What ensued is now known as the Herero and Namaqua Genocide.

All that happened in 1904.

Victoria had several siblings, including a younger sister, Isabel or Isabella. We have three frames of Isabel's life, starting in July 1897, when the Fort Wayne (Ind.) News ran a short piece about her:


Interesting girl. Isabel was probably born in 1874, which would have made her about 25 years old at the time, but both Victoria and Isabel gave different ages or years of birth in every census, always making themselves younger than you would predict from the last, and we can't be sure the first record was correct.

It's easy to imagine Professor Leutwein's concerns about Isabel. I can almost hear the nuns in The Sound of Music singing, "How Do You Solve a Problem Like Isabella?" Letters were no doubt exchanged with his brother in German South West Africa. Until, in February 1903, the Kalamazoo Gazette ran this story ...


Don't miss that last paragraph.

Whether Isabel made it to Africa, or was still in Germany when her uncle Theodor returned there in 1904, I've been unable to determine. The third frame from her life to be presented here was taken in 1910. At that time, the U.S. Census finds her in Redfield, South Dakota, married 5 years to Emmett C. Ryan. She has a daughter, Maurine; another child died in infancy. In 1922 Emmett Ryan would be the (unsuccessful) Democratic candidate for Congress from South Dakota.

Isabel died in April 1958 in Washington, D.C., where she had been living with her daughter since Emmett C. Ryan died.

Finally, there was poor Carl Leutwein Jr., younger brother to Victoria and Isabel.



The "sister who saw the Kalamazoo woman in Chicago" was undoubtedly our Victoria.

That's as far down the rabbit hole as I've gone. There are more tunnels and chambers to be followed and explored.

Beautiful Victoria, with the ornate handwriting, never married. How did Victoria's picture wind up on eBay?

I suspect I'm the only living person who cares.


Thursday, January 26, 2012

Mitt Just Can't Help Himself


I've been watching tonight's Republican debate over on CNN.

Mitt just made a claim to be the son of immigrants because his father was born in Mexico.

Does he have an inner voice that says, "No, Mitt! Don't say that!"?

Apparently not.

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Musical Interlude


Paul Krugman is an interesting guy. On his NY Times blog, among very wonkish posts about economics and very angry posts about politics, he sprinkles music videos that he likes. Usually, our tastes don't match. This one, which he correctly calls "strange but wonderful," is different.



Friday, January 20, 2012

But He's Very Popular with Rabies Sufferers


Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo says "If you want to know why the GOP establishment is freaking out, check out this chart."

I didn't know the GOP establishment was freaking out, but am glad to hear it. The red line is Newt's UNfavorability rating in the real world. And he looks like a winner in South Carolina tomorrow. We'll see.




Thursday, January 19, 2012

A Perfect Storm


Rick Perry has withdrawn from the presidential campaign. Touted by our political media as a formidable opponent when he entered the race, he turned out to be, as many have said, George Bush without the brains. [That, Anneliese, is a good example of "scarcasm."] It seemed Perry couldn't open his mouth without needlessly insulting a foreign country, most recently Turkey.

In his withdrawal speech, Rick Perry endorsed Newt Gingrich.

Even before Perry's withdrawal, Newt was riding a rocket ship in the South Carolina polls, and now leads Mitt Romney.

But Newt will get no sleep, because tonight at 10:35 CST ABC News will broadcast an interview with his second wife, Marianne, in which she will claim Newt tried to talk her into an open marriage.
“I said to him, ‘We’ve been married a long time,’” Marianne Gingrich says, in an excerpt from the interview released Thursday morning by ABC News. “And he said, ‘Yes but you want me all to yourself. Callista doesn’t care what I do.’”
Oh my!

Meanwhile, we're starting to get a notion of why Mitt Romney said he might release his tax returns in April. He apparently wants to release only his 2011 tax returns, which have not been prepared yet. We won't be able to see what he did with his money in prior years, for which returns have already been filed.

What does it matter? ABC reports:
For weeks, Romney has cited a desire for privacy as his reason for not sharing his tax returns -- a gesture of transparency that is now expected from presidential contenders.

"I can tell you we follow the tax laws," he said recently while on the campaign trail in New Hampshire. "And if there's an opportunity to save taxes, we like anybody else in this country will follow that opportunity."
Uh-oh.
But tax experts tell ABC News there are other reasons Romney may not want the public viewing his returns. As one of the wealthiest candidates to run for president in recent times, Romney has used a variety of techniques to help minimize the taxes on his estimated $250 million fortune. In addition to paying the lower tax rate on his investment income, Romney has as much as $8 million invested in at least 12 funds listed on a Cayman Islands registry. Another investment, which Romney reports as being worth between $5 million and $25 million, shows up on securities records as having been domiciled in the Caymans.

Official documents reviewed by ABC News show that Bain Capital, the private equity partnership Romney once ran, has set up some 138 secretive offshore funds in the Caymans.
Poor Rick Santorum, who advocates assassinating Russian scientists, is finally declared the winner of the Iowa caucuses – just in time to hear Perry endorse Newt. The news about the open marriage interview broke last night, so Perry already knew about it, but endorsed Newt anyway. Consider that.

But don't count Santorum out yet! The Republicans are bat**** crazy, and there's no telling who their next messiah will be.

Hey, there's always Ron Paul.

Now, to make this absolutely delicious, there's another Republican debate tonight! Who will rabies strike next?

Not to be missed. Oh, what a great idea it was for the Republicans to have a debate every 2 or 3 days!

And the South Carolina primary is Saturday.

Update: Couldn't watch the debate for more than 25 minutes. First question was to Gingrich about the interview with his second wife. Gingrich was shocked! shocked! that the CNN moderator would lead off the debate with such a question. It was all about the media attacking Republicans and protecting President Obama. Red meat for the crowd.

Republicans are bat**** crazy.


Nothing is Forever – Kodak Falls




Eastman Kodak was a giant among American companies.  There were upstarts: Fuji, Ilford, Agfa, and others. None had the prestige of Kodak, which was earned over 131 years of producing superior products. From its earliest days it had a reputation as a great place to work, and it set the standards for the film industry.

And then came digital.

Eastman Kodak has finally filed for bankruptcy. They will continue operating under bankruptcy protection.

It's Not Class Warfare – It's Math!


Andrew Tobias recommended this video, saying it had "no shouting, no ominous music – or soaring music, for that matter – just quiet common sense."  It does a good job of describing reality. Remember reality?

Don't worry, he stops with the "I do not feel disappointed ... " sentences before you want to drive pencils into your ears.


Saturday, January 14, 2012

A Good Summary


In case you missed it, Stephen Colbert is running for President of "the United States of South Carolina," and is polling better than Jon Huntsman. What's Colbert up to?

Jason Zinoman in the NY Times sees "a longtime thematic undercurrent of 'The Colbert Report': Mr. Colbert is a serious performer playing a silly character, while the media and political world are deeply silly but pretending to be serious."

Yup.



Thursday, January 12, 2012

Amazing Historical Footage


While cruising YouTube this morning, I came across this amazing footage of an interview with Czar Nicholas II, conducted in 1916.



How fascinating that it is so well preserved.

Wednesday, January 04, 2012

Perry Returns to the People Who Elected Him


Another video headline cut short by the character limit:


I'm beginning to think Talking Points Memo does this on purpose. Remember the Rick Santorum thing a few months ago? Incidentally, you can click on this video all you want, and it won't play. If you're determined to hear what Perry was really saying, click here.

Jan 9 Update: The photo which was the subject of the post is not displaying. I'm working on it.

Jan 12 Update: Finally got around to it.