This is a blog about history and politics, mostly.
Comments are welcome, and comment moderation has been turned off. To comment on a post, click on the word "Comments" below the post. You will be asked to type some letters you see. The purpose of this is to ensure you are a human being and not a spam machine.
Of course, you may be a human being and a spam machine. We'll be the judge of that.
Okay, we've had our march, and it's good to know we're not the only sane people left in America. But now what?
Here's what!
We need to focus like a laser on the 2018 elections: in the House, in the Senate, in the state legislatures. The Democratic Party has done a terrible job being a national party. It focuses only on the Presidential election and leaves the rest to the Republicans, who've been cheerfully collecting enough state legislatures to amend the Constitution or call a Constitutional convention.
We've got to stop them. We've got to build a Democratic Party that's as strong as it was in FDR's day.
Here's a two-step suggestion for getting started:
First, read this. It'll fire you up like you've never been fired up before.
Then, go to a web site called Swing Left. Swing Left was put together by a group who are not professional political people, but are pretty savvy in the use of technological tools.
At Swing Left, you put in your zip code, and it identifies the Congressional swing district nearest to your home. A swing district is one that could go either way in any given election. Many are Democrat-represented districts and need to be defended. The rest are Republican-represented districts that can be and need to be flipped.
Then, you pledge to help make sure that district votes Democratic in 2018 by giving them your email address. They send you weekly information about what's going on in the district, give you ideas on things to do to help, and let you know how to make contributions directly to the Democratic candidate there. What could be easier?
I have signed up to protect the nearest swing district to me, which is currently held by a Democrat, and to help win two swing districts nearby, currently held by Republicans. Oh, it would be so sweet to send them home.
Everyone got up unusually early for a Saturday. It was the day of the Women's March in Chicago, January 21, and BAM wasn't going to miss it. [BAM is the name the three girls are referred to by themselves and others, when they are referred to as a group. I'll refer to them here only by their initials.]
The 3 Feministas take it to the streets.
Under light jackets they wore white, they said, as a tribute to the suffragettes of a hundred years ago, on whose shoulders they consciously stood. B's t-shirt references the SCOTUS Angels, an allusion to the female members of the Supreme Court.
March organizers had originally planned for 20,000 marchers. The night before, the prediction was raised to 50,000. But by the time BAM arrived at the neighborhood El station, all trains heading downtown were packed. It was already clear this crowd was going to be WAY more than 50,000.
There was a point when nobody else could get on.
M and B managed to grab a seat when someone got off, and one sat in the other's lap. A stood the whole way down. (As did the chaperone, need we say?) They alighted near the Harold Washington Library and, amazingly, immediately found friends from school. Their friends had made ... er, um ... uh ... let's call them "kitten" ears. They're actually called something else, a reference to one of Donald Trump's favorite pastimes when a TV celebrity (and, for all we know, even now). They had made extras and gave them to BAM. After some excited chatter, the group was off for the march assembly point.
Walking under the El on the way to the March.
It was just a matter of following the flow of the crowd, and in no time at all BAM found themselves separated from their friends and in the middle of a crowd (later to be reported as 250,000 souls) that was going nowhere.
And that's where they stood for about an hour and a half. For a while, other marchers' signs were enough to keep everyone amused.
Clicking on a picture enlarges it and makes it easier to read.
While waiting for the march to begin, various chants started up in the crowd, including several initiated by BAM. The young marchers became intoxicated with their power. Well, no, not really. But they appeared to be enjoying it.
After a while, there was a slow but perceptible flow of movement toward the lake. A good theory was that the group just to the north of us (see aerial photo) was moving out, and BAM would come in behind them. But after about 10 minutes of shuffling, people in the crowd started pointing back towards the west, indicating BAM would be marching into the streets.
What no one knew until watching the news that night was that the entire march route was already effectively filled with protesters – there was no open space to march TO! The police had advised the organizers it would not be safe (not to mention possible) to have the march. The organizers then cancelled the march and retroactively made it a rally or demonstration.
All of which was totally unknown to about 250,000 people ready to march.
Presumably, somewhere people started moving off the parade route and going home, creating room for the crowd in Grant Park (see aerial shot) to take their place. This created enough movement for the Grant Park folks to move onto the streets – designated marching streets and otherwise – creating the sensation of ... wait for it ... MARCHING!
And march BAM did:
As did all those around them:
State Street (🎶that great street 🎶)
Finally, the chaperone suggested that any time BAM wanted to head back home would be okay. And within 10 minutes they were on their way to the El station. This time, though, they boarded early enough that there were seats for all three.
As the train passed the cross streets, it was clear the march had taken over the Chicago Loop.
Shot from the moving El.
A few notes about the March:
The crowd was wonderful – friendly and cheerful.
Early-on, we spotted some counter-demonstrators heading for the march. We never saw them again, and there was no trouble at all. Chicago Police reported there were no arrests.
The chaperone, being an old fart, believes that minds are not changed by vulgar language and images – in fact, they are reasons to shut your mind to the message – and unfortunately there was some of both on a few signs. Too bad about that. But let's face it: Trump set the tone.
BAM witnessed very little littering. We came across one sign on the ground. M picked it up and leaned it against a building so it could be read by passers-by.
M's parents should know that I saw her slip a five dollar bill to a grateful homeless man. I'm sure they're proud of her, as B's and A's parents are proud of their girls, and of their girls' friends.
We've received hundreds of letters and calls from people asking, "When is Sempringham going to update its data on persons listed as prostitutes in the U.S. Census to take into consideration the recently released 1940 Census?"
J. Edgar Hoover was not listed as a prostitute in the 1940 Census.
Well, we undertook a study of this very issue last year, but quickly discovered that we couldn't trust the raw data we were getting from Ancestry.com. There are 440 people in the 1940 census whose occupation includes the word "prostitute," using the Ancestry search engine, but a closer look makes it clear that something has gone awry.
Because searching the 1940 U.S. Census is free to non-subscribers, you can reproduce our results.
Type "prostitute" into the "occupation" field, and no other search terms, and you will receive the list of 440 workers in the "sex industry", as it's called today. But click through to the actual records, and you will be surprised.
Ruth Flickinger, a 73-year-old living in Pittsburgh, is described as a "prostitute nurse" in the index, but a look at the original records reassures us that she was a "practical nurse". Her grandchildren are relieved, no doubt, but perhaps a tad annoyed.
Jay Ingram, listed as a "prostitute inspector" in Los Angeles, is actually a "parachute inspector" at the airport.
Joseph John Jr., of Aurora, Indiana, is not a "prostitute mail carrier", he is a "substitute mail carrier".
John Kaszuba's wife in Chicago will be relieved to hear he is not a "prostitute laborer" but a "painting helper".
And that's just going through the first six people listed in Ancestry's indexed records.
What happened? We have three hypotheses:
The optical character reading software Ancestry uses is version 1.0.
The census entries were indexed by someone making $2 a day, for whom English was not a first language.
The records were indexed by a 400-pound person sitting on a bed somewhere.
But who knows?
Whatever the answer, you can see that this important research we have undertaken is not as easy as it seems. We have to stop laughing long enough to get the data written down. This may take some time.
Iris Luella Dement sings her song, "Let the Mystery Be". Lyrics below.
Everybody is wonderin' what and where they they all came from
Everybody is worryin' 'bout where they're gonna go
When the whole thing's done
But no one knows for certain
So it's all the same to me
Think I'll just let the mystery be
Some say once you're gone you're gone forever
And some say you're gonna come back
Some say you rest in the arms of the Saviour
If in sinful ways you lack
Some say that they're comin' back in a garden
Bunch of carrots and little sweet peas
Think I'll just let the mystery be
Everybody is wonderin' what and where they they all came from
Everybody is worryin' 'bout where they're gonna go
When the whole thing's done
But no one knows for certain
So it's all the same to me
Think I'll just let the mystery be
Some say they're goin' to a place called Glory
And I ain't saying it ain't a fact
But I've heard that I'm on the road to purgatory
And I don't like the sound of that
I believe in love and I live my life accordingly
I choose to let the mystery be
Everybody is wondering what and where they they all came from
Everybody is worryin' 'bout where they're gonna go
When the whole thing's done
But no one knows for certain
And so it's all the same to me
Think I'll just let the mystery be
Think I'll just let the mystery be
We always get more hits if we make liberal use of the word "prostitutes". Apparently the people Googling "prostitutes" are legion.
But this is a legitimate use! Bloomberg reports that we have a judgment on what country has the best prostitutes in the world, and it comes from none other than former Village People groupie, Vladimir Putin:
Trump
is “a grown man, and secondly he’s someone who has been involved with
beauty contests for many years and has met the most beautiful women in
the world,” Putin said. “I find it hard to believe that he rushed to
some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly
the best in the world.”
Vlad loves to relive his years as a Village People groupie.
Of course, if Vlad ever does decide to use the videotapes that don't exist, he will be "shocked! shocked!"
The rules of the Prostitute Olympics require Putin to turn in his score cards within two weeks.
The
sad part is that so many people treat Trump’s tweets as if they are
arguments when in fact they are carnival. With their conniption fits,
Trump’s responders feed into the dynamic he needs. They contribute to
carnival culture.
The
first problem with today’s carnival culture is that there’s an ocean of
sadism lurking just below the surface. The second is that it’s not
real. It doesn’t really address the inequalities that give rise to it.
It’s just combative display.
This
is a resolution I’m probably going to break, but I resolve to write
about Trump only on the presidential level, not on the carnival level.
I’m going to try to respond only to what he does, not what he says or
tweets. I really wish some of my media confreres would do the same. [Italics are my emphasis.)
The problem with this is that the carnival culture is not just his tweets, it's his whole life, including "the presidential level". God help us.
British reporting about Christopher Steele, the MI6 agent who collected the dossier on Donald Trump:
Mr Steele also decided to pass on information to both British and
American intelligence officials after concluding that such material
should not just be in the hands of political opponents of Mr Trump, who had hired his services, but was a matter of national security for both countries.
However, say security sources, Mr Steele became increasingly
frustrated that the FBI was failing to take action on the intelligence
from others as well as him. He came to believe there was a cover-up,
that a cabal within the Bureau blocked a thorough inquiry into Mr Trump,
focusing instead on the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails.
It is believed that a colleague of Mr Steele in Washington, Glenn Simpson, a former Wall Street Journal
reporter who runs the firm Fusion GPS, felt the same way and, at the
end also continued with the Trump case without being paid.
Mark Salter, John McCain's former chief of staff, writes:
If any of the allegations are true, and if our worst fears about
Trump’s temperament are realized, no one with power or influence today
will be remembered for whether they tinkered with Medicare reimbursement
rates or lowered the corporate tax rate or disapproved of a Supreme
Court appointment or won a Pulitzer Prize or had the highest ratings on
cable television.
They will be remembered for whether they tried to protect the country
from the grave harm Trump could do or whether, by negligence or active
support, they helped him do it.
In the upper right is Aleksandr Bastrykin, a Russian spy who was sanctioned by Obama. In the lower left is a picture of Obama, with the caption "Bye-bye, Obama!"
David Corn talks about his October meeting with Christopher Steele, the former MI6 agent who may have saved the western world:
After speaking with the former counterintelligence official, I was able
to confirm his identity and expertise. A senior US administration
official told me that he had worked with the onetime spook and that the
former spy had an established and respected track record of providing US
government agencies with accurate and valuable information about
sensitive national security matters. "He is a credible source who has
provided information to the US government for a long time, which senior
officials have found to be highly credible," this US official said.
Anne Applebaum in the Washington Post catalogs some things we know about Trump, exclusive of Christopher Steele's memo or the declassified version of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence report on Russian involvement in the presidential campaign, including:
Throughout the campaign, Trump repeated slogans and conspiracy theories —
“Obama invented ISIS,” “Hillary will start World War III” — lifted from Sputnik,
the Russian propaganda website. Was this just Trump campaign chief
Stephen K. Bannon borrowing ideas, or Manafort using tactics he
perfected in Ukraine? Or was there deliberate linkage?
She concludes:
Information doesn’t have to be secret to be shocking. Trump doesn’t have
to be a Manchurian candidate who has been hypnotized or recruited by
foreign intelligence. It’s enough that he has direct and indirect links
to a profoundly corrupt and violent foreign dictator, whose policies he
admires, whose advisers he shares and whose slogans he uses. That’s
kompromat enough for me.
With malice toward none, with charity for all, with
firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on
to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care
for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his
orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace
among ourselves and with all nations.
And then — “150 years of investment in education and social progress later” — President-Elect Donald Trump:
Wow, the ratings are in and Arnold Schwarzenegger got
“swamped” (or destroyed) by comparison to the ratings machine, DJT. So
much for being a movie star – and that was season 1 compared to season
14. Now compare him to my season 1. But who cares, he supported Kasich
& Hillary.
The Russian
government was in touch with members of President-elect Donald Trump's
political team during the U.S. election campaign and knows most of his
entourage, one of Russia's most senior diplomats told the Interfax news
agency on Thursday.
Accused
by defeated Democratic contender Hillary Clinton of being a puppet of
President Vladimir Putin after praising the Russian leader, Trump has
dismissed suggestions he had anything to do with the Russian government
during the campaign.
But in
comments that could prove politically awkward for the president-elect,
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said there had indeed
been some communications.
"There
were contacts," Interfax cited Ryabkov as saying. "We are doing this and
have been doing this during the election campaign."
Such
contacts would continue, he added, saying the Russian government knew
and had been in touch with many of Trump's closest allies. He did not
name names.
On Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid ... sent Comey a fiery letter
saying the FBI chief may have broken the law and pointed to a
potentially greater controversy: "In my communications with you and
other top officials in the national security community, it has become
clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and
coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian
government…The public has a right to know this information."
Conservative columnist Kathleen Parker writes for the Washington Post and is syndicated, according to Wikipedia, in more than 400 outlets.
Today she writes [my emphases]:
What is so obviously a conspiracy of Russian leadership, hackers and spies,
Trump has repeatedly dismissed as lousy intelligence. Why would he do
such a thing? Is it that he’s so thin-skinned he can’t tolerate anyone
thinking that he might have benefited from the cyberattack? Or is it
that he knew about it in advance and doesn’t want to be found out? This
is how conspiracy theories get started. Then again, sometimes a
conspiracy is just a conspiracy — and a fool is just a fool.
Consider
what we know: Our best intelligence indicates that Russia was behind
the hacking of the Democratic National Committee. Trump, who has long
expressed admiration for Russian President Vladimir Putin (once a KGB
agent, always a KGB agent), has his doubts.
Obviously,
Trump wants to preserve the narrative that he won fair and square. And,
clearly, claims of Russian interference would muss his ego. But is that
it? Ego and narrative?
Consider further: Trump would rather
make common cause with our fiercest geopolitical adversary (hat tip Mitt
Romney) than take the word of our best people. Moreover, he has said he
won’t receive daily security briefings and reportedly plans to reduce
our security agencies.
Pray tell, whose side is this man on? When was the last time you had to ask that question about a president-elect?
On Friday,
Trump met with real American spies and others who attempted to explain
things to him, leaving open the question: Can Trump learn? From his
statement following the meeting, it doesn’t seem so.
On Thursday,
James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, told the
Senate Armed Services Committee that the agency is “now even more
resolute,” and that Trump is damaging American intelligence (not to be
confused with the absence thereof, to wit, Trump). To top things off,
former CIA director James Woolsey quit Trump’s transition team Thursday in protest against being bypassed.
In
sum, when the president-elect persists in a state of denial, siding
with the enemy against his own country’s best interests, one is forced
to consider that Trump himself poses a threat to national security.
In Russia, they’d just call it treason.
Meanwhile, Trump said a week ago that he knew things about the email hacking that others didn't know, and that he would share that information with us on Tuesday or Wednesday of last week. Guess what never happened!
The
Trump campaign knew in advance about WikiLeaks’ plans. Days before the
Podesta email release began, Roger Stone, a Republican operative working
with the Trump campaign, sent out an excited tweet about what was
coming.
But
in an interview, Mr. Stone said he had no role in the leaks; he had
just heard from an American with ties to WikiLeaks that damning emails
were coming.
Over the holidays, a person I know started speaking favorably about "Republican values". I was dying to ask just what "Republican values" are, but it was the holidays, and really, I didn't see any plus side to blowing up the relationship.
Joe Biden says, "Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value."
Which is only broadly related to this post, the purpose of which is to point you to David Brooks's column this morning.
It concludes:
I’ll
be curious to see if Trump’s public rhetoric becomes operationalized in
any way. For example, I bet his bromance with Putin will end badly. The
two men are both such blustery, insecure, aggressive public posturers,
sooner or later they will get in a schoolyard fight.
It
will be interesting to see if that brawl is just an escalating but
ultimately harmless volley of verbiage, or whether it affects the
substance of government policy and leads to nuclear war.
The New York Times published a series of short essays after the election that sought to explain or complain. I thought this one made several good points. But is it also an example of what right wing pundits would call liberals' reflex reaction to blame ourselves?
It turns out that shaming the supporters of Donald J. Trump is not a good political strategy.
Though job loss and economic stagnation
played a role in his victory, so did shame. As the principal
investigator on a study of the middle class for the National Institute
of Mental Health, I found that working people’s stress is often
intensified by shame at their failure to “make it” in what they are
taught is a meritocratic American economy.
The right has been very successful at
persuading working people that they are vulnerable not because they
themselves have failed, but because of the selfishness of some other
villain (African-Americans, feminists, immigrants, Muslims, Jews,
liberals, progressives; the list keeps growing).
Instead of challenging this ideology of
shame, the left has buttressed it by blaming white people as a whole for
slavery, genocide of the Native Americans and a host of other sins, as
though whiteness itself was something about which people ought to be
ashamed. The rage many white working-class people feel in response is
rooted in the sense that once again, as has happened to them throughout
their lives, they are being misunderstood.
So please understand what is happening
here. Many Trump supporters very legitimately feel that it is they who
have been facing an unfair reality. The upper 20 percent of income
earners, many of them quite liberal and rightly committed to the defense
of minorities and immigrants, also believe in the economic meritocracy
and their own right to have so much more than those who are less
fortunate. So while they may be progressive on issues of discrimination
against the obvious victims of racism and sexism, they are blind to
their own class privilege and to the hidden injuries of class that are
internalized by much of the country as self-blame.
The right’s ability to portray liberals
as elitists is further strengthened by the phobia toward religion that
prevails in the left. Many religious people are drawn by the teachings
of their tradition to humane values and caring about the oppressed. Yet
they often find that liberal culture is hostile to religion of any sort,
believing it is irrational and filled with hate. People on the left
rarely open themselves to the possibility that there could be a
spiritual crisis in society that plays a role in the lives of many who
feel misunderstood and denigrated by the fancy intellectuals and radical
activists.
The left needs to stop ignoring people’s
inner pain and fear. The racism, sexism and xenophobia used by Mr. Trump
to advance his candidacy does not reveal an inherent malice in the
majority of Americans. If the left could abandon all this shaming, it
could rebuild its political base by helping Americans see that much of
people’s suffering is rooted in the hidden injuries of class and in the
spiritual crisis that the global competitive marketplace generates.
Democrats need to become as conscious and
articulate about the suffering caused by classism as we are about other
forms of suffering. We need to reach out to Trump voters in a spirit of
empathy and contrition. Only then can we help working people understand
that they do not live in a meritocracy, that their intuition that the
system is rigged is correct (but it is not by those whom they had been
taught to blame) and that their pain and rage is legitimate.
Michael Lerner, the rabbi of Beyt
Tikkun Synagogue in Berkeley, Calif., is the editor of Tikkun magazine
and chairman of the Network of Spiritual Progressives.
Merry Christmas to all! Over two millennia ago, a new hope was born into
the world, a Savior who would offer the promise of salvation to all
mankind. Just as the three wise men did on that night, this Christmas
heralds a time to celebrate the good news of a new King. We hope
Americans celebrating Christmas today will enjoy a day of festivities
and a renewed closeness with family and friends.
Hat tip to Daniel W. Drezner, who apparently actually reads Reince Priebus's Christmas messages.
UPDATE: The RNC is offended that anyone read Priebus's Christmas message as referring to Trump.
Here's what I know. Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises
are as worthless as a degree from Trump University. He's playing the
American public for suckers: He gets a free ride to the White House and
all we get is a lousy hat.
His domestic policies would lead to recession. His foreign policies
would make America and the world less safe. He has neither the
temperament nor the judgment to be president. And his personal qualities
would mean that America would cease to be a shining city on a hill.
Yet Romney showed up for a job interview as Trump's Secretary of State.
I guess there's a couple of ways you can look at Romney's wanting to be considered for the job. In one version, he's doing his patriotic duty by trying to insert at least one responsible adult (himself, he imagines) into the Trump Administration. Maybe he could limit the damage.
In the other version, he's a man who doesn't even pay attention to himself: "Here's what I know. Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud."
The crazy old uncle at Thanksgiving Day dinner, and a confident of Mr. Trump's, Roger Stone, clues us in on what was going on with the job interview:
“Donald Trump was interviewing Mitt Romney for Secretary of State in order to torture him,” Stone claimed.... "To toy with him. And given the history, that’s
completely understandable. Mitt Romney crossed a line. He didn’t just
oppose Trump, which is his democratic right, he called him a phony and a
fraud. And a con man. And that’s not the kind of man you want as
Secretary of State.”
In nominating Tillerson, Trump is handing the State Department to a man
who has worked his whole life running a parallel quasi-state, for the
benefit of shareholders, fashioning relationships with foreign leaders
that may or may not conform to the interests of the United States
government. In his career at ExxonMobil, Tillerson has no doubt honed
many of the day-to-day skills that a Secretary of State must exercise:
absorbing complex political analysis, evaluating foreign leaders,
attending ceremonial events, and negotiating with friends and
adversaries. Tillerson is a devotee of Abraham Lincoln, so perhaps he
has privately harbored the ambition to transform himself into a true
statesman, on behalf of all Americans. Yet it is hard to imagine, after
four decades at ExxonMobil and a decade leading the corporation, how
Tillerson will suddenly develop respect and affection for the American
diplomatic service he will now lead, or embrace a vision of America’s
place in the world that promotes ideals for their own sake, emphatically
privileging national interests over private ones.
Other Tillerson boosters, in addition to Gates & Rice: Stephen
Hadley, Jim Baker & Dick Cheney. Full court press planned for
confirmation.
It looks like Rick Perry is getting the Department of Energy post. Remember Perry's "Oops!" moment in the 2012 Republican debates? Pundits have been having a great time reminding us that it was the Department of Energy that Perry wanted to abolish, but couldn't think of.
The holiest of all holidays are those
Kept by ourselves in silence and apart;
The secret anniversaries of the heart,
When the full river of feeling overflows....
As Yale University Professor Timothy Snyder reminded us in Thursday's post, the Nazis created or
waited for crisis situations, then took advantage of them to take
drastic actions. The day after the Reichstag fire, nearly all civil
liberties were suspended in Germany: freedom of speech, freedom of
press, habeas corpus, etc.
Professor Snyder's cautions hit home with me because for more than a year I've been immersed in 1930's Germany. I'm working on a book about Emily's family's escape from Mannheim, Germany, and because of that, parallels between that time and our own come screaming out at me.
It's scary.
The Hauptsynagogue in Mannheim, roofless after being set ablaze on Kristallnacht.
The Holocaust began with Kristallnacht, an orgy of thuggery across Germany in early November 1938. Jewish men were arrested and taken to concentration camps, Jewish businesses were vandalized and ruined, and 1000 synagogues in Germany and Austria were destroyed. As the elimination of civil liberties was "justified" by the Reichstag fire, the destruction and arrests associated with Kristallnacht were "justified" by the assassination of a German diplomat. Interestingly, the assassination was in revenge for the deportation of immigrants.
I have a section in the book about it:
Most
mornings a barber visited the Rosenberger apartment in Mannheim. Opa Freiberg had a
standing appointment – not for a trim, but to have his head shaved.
Heinrich Freiberg's grandchildren thought he was mostly bald anyway, but he actually had
a full head of hair; he just preferred a shaved head. Because it was not safe for the barber to serve Jewish customers in his shop, he came
to the Rosenberger apartment, where he would not be observed.
On the morning of
November 10, 1938, a Thursday, Emil was lying in bed when the barber arrived. Emil had a cold, and his mother decided it was best to keep him home from school. As he was lying there, he might have been thinking ahead to his
bar Mitzvah, planned for later that month.
But on that morning, he heard the barber arrive with a terrifying warning: During the night mobs had burned down the Rosenberger's synagogue, he said, and now
the SS were going from door to door, arresting all Jewish men.
[snip]
Just
two weeks before the barber’s warning, 17,000 Polish Jews (called Ostjuden, or Eastern Jews), including many living in Mannheim and attending synagogue
there, had been rounded up and expelled from Germany without
warning. The deportation was the culmination of a German/Polish
tit-for-tat of legislation and decrees, each government
determined to reduce the number of Jews within its borders.
In
March 1938 the Polish legislature passed a law, targeted primarily at Jews, which revoked the citizenship of any person who had lived
outside the country for 5 or more years without being in touch with the
Polish government. According to Nazi estimates, there were up to 70,000
Polish Jews living within German borders. If the Polish law applied to them, they would be
rendered stateless – with no country that would accept them – and thus permanent residents of Germany. At first, little action was taken by the Poles to implement their
law, allowing the Germans to make a move of their own.
On
August 22, a German police order announced that all residence permits
for foreign nationals would expire by March 31, 1939. Although
foreigners could request new residence permits before the end of 1938, the
permits would be issued only to those considered “worthy”. In the Nazi
state, no Jew qualified as “worthy”.
The Polish
government understood that the result of the German legislation would be the
return of tens of thousands of Polish Jews, and moved to quickly cut off that possibility. On October 15 an order was published by the
Polish Ministry of the Interior requiring citizens living outside the
country to present their passports at a Polish consulate within the next
15 days. If, upon inspection, the provisions of the March legislation
concerning 5 years’ absence from the country were found to apply, the
presenter’s citizenship would be immediately revoked.
After seeking
assurances from the Polish government that Polish Jews resident in
Germany would be allowed to return to their native country regardless of
the Ministry’s order – and receiving no such assurance – the German
government took action. On October 27, Polish Jews were arrested
throughout the country – including at least 75 men, women, and children from Mannheim. They were forced to leave all their possessions behind and
transported to the border, where they were unceremoniously, and with
great resistance from the Poles, deported.
North of Mannheim, in Hanover, a Polish family named Grynszpan was one of those arrested. Sendel
Grynszpan and his wife, Rivka, had lived in Hanover for more than 25 years. At the trial of
Adolph Eichmann in 1961, Sendel, a tailor, described his
family’s deportation:
On [Thursday] October 27, 1938,
in the evening, a policeman came to my home and asked us to go to the
11th precinct with our passports. He assured us that we would be
returning directly and that it was unnecessary to take our belongings
with us. When I arrived at the precinct with my family, we found many
people there, seated and standing, and some of them in tears. A police
inspector was shouting at them, “Sign this paper. You are expelled.”
…
On Friday night they put us in police vans, 20 to a van, and took us to
the station. The street was full of people chanting, “The Jews to
Palestine!” We were taken to Neu-Bentschen, the last German city before
the Polish frontier, arriving at 6:00 a.m., Saturday the 29th.
…
At the border we were searched and our money taken from us. They left
us with only 10 RM each. German law forbade the export of capital. They
said to us, “When you arrived, you only had 10 RM; there’s no reason for
you to leave with more than that.”
Arrested and
deported with Sendel Grynszpan were his wife, a daughter, Berta,
and probably others of the couple’s six children. A son,
17-year-old Herschel, was in Paris for schooling.
Herschel
received a note from his sister Berta on Thursday, November 3, describing what was happening to his family. On Friday he pored over
lengthy and graphic accounts of the deportations in Paris’s Yiddish
press, becoming increasingly agitated. Sunday Herschel purchased a pistol, and on Monday morning, November
7, he appeared at the German embassy, intent upon assassinating the
German ambassador to France in revenge for what had been done to his family. Instead, he shot and wounded the first
embassy officer to appear, a third secretary named Ernst vom Rath.
Herschel Grynszpan in French custody after shooting Ernst vom Rath.
Vom
Rath died on the afternoon of November 8. Reaction from Berlin was
swift in coming. All Jewish periodicals in Germany were ordered to
cease publication immediately. On Wednesday, November 9, inflammatory
articles in the non-Jewish newspapers quoted Joseph Goebbels as saying,
“The German people are entitled to identify the Jews in Germany with
this crime.”
And that night, using the excuse of a murder by a Jewish immigrant, Kristallnacht began.
15. Establish a private life. Nastier rulers will use what they know
about you to push you around. Scrub your computer of malware. Remember
that email is skywriting. Consider using alternative forms of the
internet, or simply using it less. Have personal exchanges in person.
For the same reason, resolve any legal trouble. Authoritarianism works
as a blackmail state, looking for the hook on which to hang you. Try
not to have too many hooks.
17. Watch out for the paramilitaries. When the men with guns who have
always claimed to be against the system start wearing uniforms and
marching around with torches and pictures of a Leader, the end is nigh.
When the pro-Leader paramilitary and the official police and military
intermingle, the game is over.
19. Be as courageous as you can. If none of us is prepared to die for freedom, then all of us will die in unfreedom.
One item, number five, touched on something I've been meaning to write about for months:
5. Be calm when the unthinkable arrives. When the terrorist attack
comes, remember that all authoritarians at all times either await or
plan such events in order to consolidate power. Think of the Reichstag
fire. The sudden disaster that requires the end of the balance of
power, the end of opposition parties, and so on, is the oldest trick in
the Hitlerian book. Don't fall for it. [My emphasis.]
Professor Snyder mentions the Reichstag fire, but he may just as well have mentioned the assassination in Paris of the German diplomat, Ernst vom Rath, the event that Joseph Goebbels seized upon to launch what became known as Kristallnacht, the first pogrom of the Holocaust.
On Memorial Day I happened to call my eldest brother, Mike. ("Eldest" sounds better than "oldest", doesn't it?) In the course of the conversation he mentioned that he was dedicating his Memorial Day to the memory of a photographer he met in Vietnam, Henri Huet. The more he talked, the more interested I became, and I eventually told Mike I would write a Sempringham post about Huet.
Then the Republicans nominated a megalomaniac as their candidate for President, and ambition went out the window.
Happily, Mike picked up the torch and wrote the post for me, in the form of an email to our siblings. He has given me permission to edit it slightly to make it more like a blog post, and to publish it here:
It's interesting: you can find many of Henri Huet's photographs in
Wikipedia but little of his life. He was born in Vietnam of a French
father and a Vietnamese mother. He was sent off to school in France at
about the age of five. He studied art while in France and one observer
wrote his photos were composed like paintings rather than photos. I
can't comment one way or another on that but I do know that he was
called "the best photojournalist of the Vietnamese war" by the Saigon AP bureau chief.
Henri Huet
I met him on only one or two occasions at the press club in Danang,
Vietnam. One of his bureau chiefs wrote that it was enjoyable working
with Huet because he always had a smile on his face. I observed that
smile, and even then I thought it was not a smile of a happy man but of one
who had seen so much that he felt it was better to smile.
The Marines of the Third Battalion, who were stationed in and
around Danang then, thought highly of him. He had been in Vietnam during
"The First War". He was in the French Navy, where he learned the basics
of photography. He stayed in Vietnam after the French defeat at Dien
Bien Phu. Henri had a wife in France
and a mistress in Vietnam.
Medic Thomas Cole, wounded himself, assists a wounded soldier from the First Cavalry Division.
The Marines thought highly of him for several reasons. First, because he
was the "old man"; he had seen this war back when it was a French war
and now it was an American war. He had seen much carnage and
death. Second, because he really immersed himself in the life and ways of
the Marines in "I Corps", unlike many photojournalists who were there to
"cover the war". It was these people that I saw angrily pushed away by
the Marines who didn't want "a goddamn camera" pushed into their faces
while they were recovering the bodies of their buddies. I remember
distinctly a group of college kiddies from some school in Ohio who came
out to report on how horrible the war was. I was seriously afraid that
we would have to get those kids out of there before the Marines slit
their throats. You don't preach antiwar stuff to Marines who have just
finished a firefight. Third, Henri could speak French, English, and Vietnamese, which made him useful. And interestingly, most of all the Marines
considered Henri a good luck charm, since he always seemed to come back
from even the worst battles with whatever group he went out with. I
realize that I met Henri only once or twice but he made an impression on
me that lasts until this day.
Infantrymen in a bomb crater search for snipers firing at them.
I don't know if any of you are familiar with his photographs.
They made the front page of Life Magazine in the 60's. You might want to
look some of them up, they are in Wikipedia. One I had never seen
before was in the book that a brother sent me about photojournalists in
Vietnam. You see a soldier dragging a wooden ammunition box up the bank
of a river and in the background you see a 40 mm machine gun. I thought,
"Gee it was pretty clever of them to set that machine-gun up on a sliver
of soil in the middle of the Mekong River." And then you look more
closely and you see that the machine-gun is being held up by one great
big hand! Some soldier was crossing the river and didn't want to get the
machine-gun wet so he was holding it up high over his head and that
means the river water was over his head, he was walking on the bottom
carrying an M60 machine gun (not one of those dinky AK47's)! This is an
incredible photo.
Huet also captured this photo, similar to the one Mike describes above.
Henri's luck ran out in the early 70s – not with a bunch of Marines in a
firefight but in a helicopter carrying several photojournalists and a
Vietnamese general. The crash site was finally found after the second
(i.e American) Vietnam War had been settled. They found small pieces of
bone along with the helicopter wreckage. At that point there was no way
of determining whose bones had been found and there was a big brouhaha
about where to bury them. They were finally interred at the Newsmuseum
in Washington, DC, in a small ceremony with about 100 attendees.
Huet took this photo of a chaplain administering last rites for photojournalist Dickey Chapelle as she died from a booby trap explosion.
Every Memorial Day I think about Henri and wonder if there are any
people left in France who remember him and his accomplishments. Soon we
will probably all be gone and people will have to look them up in
Wikipedia.
J. Alex Halderman, Professor of Computer Science at the University of Michigan, explains why, though he does not believe the voting system in Wisconsin was hacked, it makes perfect sense to do a manual recount of the votes there.
For the record, I hope no evidence of hacking or otherwise miscounting is found. I hope they find that the votes were counted correctly. The Trump people just wouldn't be able to handle it otherwise.
Betsy Prince DeVos prepares for her confirmation hearing.
Here's a 2011 article about Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy Prince DeVos, and her husband, Dick DeVos. They have been campaigning for years to end public education in America.
The decades-long campaign to end public education is propelled by the
super-wealthy, right-wing DeVos family. Betsy Prince DeVos is the sister
of Erik Prince, founder of the notorious private military contractor
Blackwater USA (now Xe), and wife of Dick DeVos, son of the co-founder
of Amway, the multi-tiered home products business.
[snip]
The conservative policy institutes founded beginning in the 1970s get hundreds of millions
of dollars from wealthy families and foundations to develop and promote
free market fundamentalism. More specifically, their goals include
privatizing social security, reducing government regulations, thwarting
environmental policy, dismantling unions -- and eliminating public schools.
Whatever they may say about giving poor students a leg up, their real
priority is nothing short of the total dismantling of our public
educational institutions, and they've admitted as much. Cato Institute
founder Ed Crane and other conservative think tank leaders have signed
the Public Proclamation to Separate School and State,
which reads in part that signing on, "Announces to the world your
commitment to end involvement by local, state, and federal government
from education."
Only they're not calling it public education:
Dick DeVos also explained to his Heritage Foundation audience that they
should no longer use the term public schools, but instead start calling
them “government schools.” He noted that the role of wealthy
conservatives would have to be obscured. “We need to be cautious about
talking too much about these activities,” said DeVos, and pointed to the
need to “cut across a lot of historic boundaries, be they partisan,
ethnic, or otherwise.”
Be sure to read Nicholas Kristof's take on Trump's new team, including our next National Security Advisor, Lt. Gen. (ret.) Michael Flynn. It's called Trump Embarrasses Himself and Our Country.
A few clips:
Flynn
had a brilliant military career and did an outstanding job in Iraq and
Afghanistan. Five years ago, he was widely admired as the best
intelligence officer of his generation.
Then
President Obama nominated Flynn to become director of the Defense
Intelligence Agency, and he began to unravel. He turned out to be a
catastrophic manager. Colin Powell, former secretary of state, explained
in hacked emails why Flynn was fired: “abusive with staff, didn’t
listen, worked against policy, bad management.” Powell added that ever
since, Flynn has been “right-wing nutty.”
[snip]
Indeed,
for an intelligence officer, Flynn seems to have trouble distinguishing
truth from falsehood. Earlier this month, he tweeted an obviously fake story
claiming that the police had found emails linking Hillary Clinton to
sex crimes with children. When he was in government, subordinates had a
special name for his delusions: “Flynn facts.”
Another
problem is Flynn’s ties to foreign governments. He took money from
Russia to attend an event in Moscow, sitting near President Vladimir
Putin. He also appears to have taken money from Turkish interests and, without publicly disclosing the money, wrote an op-ed shilling for Turkey.
For his chief of staff, Flynn chose his son, who is a looney on social media, calling President Obama a communist and fascist, tweeting racially insensitive comments and sharing absurd conspiracy theories. [My emphasis]
Scared yet?
Hat Tip to Kevin Drum, who pointed us to Kristoff's column.
Since Sempringham readers are, to a person, well-read, informed people, there's no need here to do more than summarize the incident this post will refer to. Vice President-elect Mike Pence attended a performance of Hamilton in New York City. When he entered the theater he was met by boos from the audience. At the conclusion of the play the actor playing Aaron Burr (hmmm) – with the support of the cast and the play's author – read a seemingly respectful statement to him, singling him out in the audience, affirming their hope that he will value diversity.
Whereupon Donald Trump tweeted that the cast should apologize. Whereupon Mike Pence stated he was not offended.
Here at Sempringham we were at first supportive of the Hamilton casts' action. Let's face it: no Trump/Pence fans here. But we were persuaded otherwise by the Chicago Sun-Times' drama critic, Hedy Weiss. In her column this morning, Ms. Weiss writes:
[W]hile I oppose almost everything this new administration stands for
(aside from infrastructure repair) and admittedly cast my vote for the
electoral loser in the race, I think both the New York audience protests and the emotional, carefully worded speech from the stage aimed at Vice
President-elect Mike Pence were mistakes. How or why he went to see
“Hamilton” in the first place remains a mystery. But perhaps, had he
been allowed to just absorb the message of the musical, he might have
been changed, if only in the most minute and imperceptible ways. Now,
like a bull reacting to a red cape, any possibility of the show itself
for serving as an agent of positive change or a subtle awakening in
Pence has been lost forever. A missed opportunity, and a pity.
[Snip]
I think it is for Hamlet, not Hamilton, to have the last words on the
whole matter: “The play’s the thing/Wherein I’ll catch the conscience of
the king.”
On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century, by Timothy Snyder (New York: Crown, 2017
"Both fascism and communism were responses to globalization: to the real and perceived inequalities it created, and the apparent helplessness of the democracies in addressing them. Fascists rejected reason in the name of will, denying objective truth in favor of a glorious myth articulated by leaders who claimed to give voice to the people. They put a face on globalization, arguing that its complex challenges were the result of a conspiracy against the nation.
Americans today are no wiser than the Europeans who saw democracy yield to fascism, Naziism, or communism in the twentiety century. Our one advantage is that we might learn from their experience. Now is a good time to do so.